A few days ago, Posts to see such a "job for a couple of days, resigned" http://www.javaeye.com/post/924599. Landlord said that he has entered a development confusion, technological obsolescence of the company. Resigned two days later. Keep abreast of a lot of people think "money is like many other casually," "they can learn", "through their own efforts to transform the company," I think "go right, go as soon as possible." Some people say that I am more radical. I admit, somewhat extreme. In fact, this is usually by the guy who倚老卖老the downtown air. What did you say the database paradigm insist he did not say slow redundancy. You have to layered, object-oriented development, the field of modeling you扯蛋him say. Those available in the market of software engineering books are nonsense, Hibernate's use, however the people are attracted because SQL dishes too. Add me a friend by this firm to set up the waste, and so to see this one on the gas companies not to fight to a.
I am here and want to talk about the U.S., a development disorder of the companies, technologies are used in the last century levels (in the application of software development can be said that the Stone Age), and there is no software engineering management (demand confusion, bosses and clients racking our brains on a one out soon also), programmer with the status quo (I think slightly does not ask for change then also used the old technology, at least to engage in engage in remodeling rather than copy paste everywhere), overtime already numb. One inattentive you into such a company, it is possible through their own efforts to introduce new technologies to improve the development process吗?
Posts landlord of the article is based on an ordinary Java programmers to add new, and soon resigned. Programmers joined the company in general is common programmers (the above code how to say how the code below), Senior Programmer (responsible for the design, technology selection), technical director (as tall head, the size of firms not Say).
Everyone will talk about identity in order to add these companies, if you want to change the reality behind the development, which moves them? How many chances of success? Whether the encounter was hostile to other people, such as frame-up case to the boss. And this reflects the effect of changes in the former will bring about confusion (change is bound to cause confusion), money and time costs (training to spend money, that is, internal training, but also diverted development time, not to mention overtime training, overtime hours early count to the development of the Village), Interpersonal relations nervous (other people think you enjoy the limelight, try hard to find fault, to resist the reform) and so on all kinds of questions. Boss may see the benefits before the first can not afford the cost of opposing the reform. What are the measures to deal with these difficulties?
Have is, if the inability to transform the environment, there may not be able to self-POLLUTION and new technology? Now called the economic crisis more serious. Effectiveness of the company, whether good or bad a lot of love to say "no money because the crisis", many fear to spend money. Also afraid of a lot of staff resigned can not find new jobs. Also to talk about how everyone in this environment to preserve themselves, not to be paraplegic. But I think if we do not leave, basically must have been ahead of. Is the self-study and also because there is no time to work overtime.
I am here and want to talk about the U.S., a development disorder of the companies, technologies are used in the last century levels (in the application of software development can be said that the Stone Age), and there is no software engineering management (demand confusion, bosses and clients racking our brains on a one out soon also), programmer with the status quo (I think slightly does not ask for change then also used the old technology, at least to engage in engage in remodeling rather than copy paste everywhere), overtime already numb. One inattentive you into such a company, it is possible through their own efforts to introduce new technologies to improve the development process吗?
Posts landlord of the article is based on an ordinary Java programmers to add new, and soon resigned. Programmers joined the company in general is common programmers (the above code how to say how the code below), Senior Programmer (responsible for the design, technology selection), technical director (as tall head, the size of firms not Say).
Everyone will talk about identity in order to add these companies, if you want to change the reality behind the development, which moves them? How many chances of success? Whether the encounter was hostile to other people, such as frame-up case to the boss. And this reflects the effect of changes in the former will bring about confusion (change is bound to cause confusion), money and time costs (training to spend money, that is, internal training, but also diverted development time, not to mention overtime training, overtime hours early count to the development of the Village), Interpersonal relations nervous (other people think you enjoy the limelight, try hard to find fault, to resist the reform) and so on all kinds of questions. Boss may see the benefits before the first can not afford the cost of opposing the reform. What are the measures to deal with these difficulties?
Have is, if the inability to transform the environment, there may not be able to self-POLLUTION and new technology? Now called the economic crisis more serious. Effectiveness of the company, whether good or bad a lot of love to say "no money because the crisis", many fear to spend money. Also afraid of a lot of staff resigned can not find new jobs. Also to talk about how everyone in this environment to preserve themselves, not to be paraplegic. But I think if we do not leave, basically must have been ahead of. Is the self-study and also because there is no time to work overtime.