http://www.javaeye.com/topic/361710
Many people do not agree with my views, and in fact the situation is now basically do as you said: "more than 30-year-old mixed should not look to change jobs a few such people." We could use facts, not放空炮.
I think this is the problem of a critical point.
Many people, upon graduation basic二十七八-year-old looks like in the next two years learning at work, the three-year-old shook up some of the initial development of skills, after a long way to go technology.
Our children abroad than others, some from smaller age learned programming, they have good soil to the growth of the professional skills of a good education, said 30-year-old before they may be some late entry. For example, Berkeley and other UC Berkeley
But we are different, and no student is not a late stage in the university to know what is meant by development, is not useful to know the theory, the computer is a practical science, a strong ability to do. This explosion of knowledge in the computer era, not after several years of training and practice how can entry?
After entry to understand its own development direction look toward the goal.
I mean, on the one hand, wish to make it clear: technology is not engaged in a year two years, or to do an act under the heart. Although the high-level language learning in 2012 is already very skilled, but the high-level language is easy-depth entry difficult and out of high-level language faster upgrades.
On the other hand is: should not focus only on the study of these "popular" technology and, if so, it really is in the eating "young rice", this year it will be popular next year, so popular?
Finally, there is:
Know the youth is to eat rice, it should find a solution, otherwise large age when, according to the domestic market, the project team there are people who stand up 20-year-old, looking for a job is not easy. Because 1> your strong technical capabilities, more than the young head of the project, working with non-conforming. 2> a lot of the company's software development technology increasingly, a variety of frameworks, there are off-the-shelf workflow, does not require you to pay a relatively high talent. 3> Why such a deformity caused by domestic phenomenon: age of technical ability but a great mix of harder?
Detached from the final analysis, is a result of technology! A surplus of skilled personnel and the other some kind of technology will not be able to recruit. So out of touch the industry of course, technology development, and lack of talent, just like the fools can not afford to help, no matter how much money they get to vote is no good. Therefore, not to mention the development of new industries, not to lay a good foundation, how to develop? ! Industrial development can not be on the provision of more jobs, while the surplus of labor resources is bound to bring a range of issues. This of course refers to the foundation of talent, when it comes to talent on the related to education. Do not do a good job in the education software industry professionals is always a vicious cycle! For education, we have also seen a considerable failure! This education includes a variety of technical communities, as well as the lack of teaching materials.
Finally, education has failed and that from now on charge of self-learning is not already too late, the plan to their own assessment.
IT may be engaged in China is a mistake from the very beginning, and from an early age never heard of IT is个啥, began more than 20-year-old contacts, teaching materials are also non-mother tongue, which had been difficult learners, together with the domestic IT and employees are the price of labor has been reduced to that of IT workers, together with the increasing burden of the family may indeed be a mistake.
Or at home can only stir up the software application, and if there is no relationship between the application software, then not even have to do. I have done government projects and small companies I have been in the outsourcing project, which was a heavenly feeling of an underground, on the whole project is to block the Government of fat, poor living conditions in small private enterprises.
Such an environment we have seen, the reasons for that: the backwardness of education personnel knowledge structure is irrational, unreasonable industrial structure caused by, resulting in the majority of IT staff can only access to the technical aspects of the application layer, there is no good to the survival of the growth of the soil . Can not be innovative.
Many people do not agree with my views, and in fact the situation is now basically do as you said: "more than 30-year-old mixed should not look to change jobs a few such people." We could use facts, not放空炮.
I think this is the problem of a critical point.
Many people, upon graduation basic二十七八-year-old looks like in the next two years learning at work, the three-year-old shook up some of the initial development of skills, after a long way to go technology.
Our children abroad than others, some from smaller age learned programming, they have good soil to the growth of the professional skills of a good education, said 30-year-old before they may be some late entry. For example, Berkeley and other UC Berkeley
But we are different, and no student is not a late stage in the university to know what is meant by development, is not useful to know the theory, the computer is a practical science, a strong ability to do. This explosion of knowledge in the computer era, not after several years of training and practice how can entry?
After entry to understand its own development direction look toward the goal.
I mean, on the one hand, wish to make it clear: technology is not engaged in a year two years, or to do an act under the heart. Although the high-level language learning in 2012 is already very skilled, but the high-level language is easy-depth entry difficult and out of high-level language faster upgrades.
On the other hand is: should not focus only on the study of these "popular" technology and, if so, it really is in the eating "young rice", this year it will be popular next year, so popular?
Finally, there is:
Know the youth is to eat rice, it should find a solution, otherwise large age when, according to the domestic market, the project team there are people who stand up 20-year-old, looking for a job is not easy. Because 1> your strong technical capabilities, more than the young head of the project, working with non-conforming. 2> a lot of the company's software development technology increasingly, a variety of frameworks, there are off-the-shelf workflow, does not require you to pay a relatively high talent. 3> Why such a deformity caused by domestic phenomenon: age of technical ability but a great mix of harder?
Detached from the final analysis, is a result of technology! A surplus of skilled personnel and the other some kind of technology will not be able to recruit. So out of touch the industry of course, technology development, and lack of talent, just like the fools can not afford to help, no matter how much money they get to vote is no good. Therefore, not to mention the development of new industries, not to lay a good foundation, how to develop? ! Industrial development can not be on the provision of more jobs, while the surplus of labor resources is bound to bring a range of issues. This of course refers to the foundation of talent, when it comes to talent on the related to education. Do not do a good job in the education software industry professionals is always a vicious cycle! For education, we have also seen a considerable failure! This education includes a variety of technical communities, as well as the lack of teaching materials.
Finally, education has failed and that from now on charge of self-learning is not already too late, the plan to their own assessment.
IT may be engaged in China is a mistake from the very beginning, and from an early age never heard of IT is个啥, began more than 20-year-old contacts, teaching materials are also non-mother tongue, which had been difficult learners, together with the domestic IT and employees are the price of labor has been reduced to that of IT workers, together with the increasing burden of the family may indeed be a mistake.
Or at home can only stir up the software application, and if there is no relationship between the application software, then not even have to do. I have done government projects and small companies I have been in the outsourcing project, which was a heavenly feeling of an underground, on the whole project is to block the Government of fat, poor living conditions in small private enterprises.
Such an environment we have seen, the reasons for that: the backwardness of education personnel knowledge structure is irrational, unreasonable industrial structure caused by, resulting in the majority of IT staff can only access to the technical aspects of the application layer, there is no good to the survival of the growth of the soil . Can not be innovative.